Skip to main content

Security report for lockrmail.com

lockrMail · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

lockrMail is a technology company offering a Chrome extension designed to enhance email privacy and optimize inbox management by providing email masking, filtering, discount alerts, and order tracking features. The company targets internet users who seek to protect their personal email addresses and reduce inbox clutter. The website is built on WordPress and hosted on AWS infrastructure, integrating modern web technologies and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and AdRoll for user tracking and advertising. The technical infrastructure supports a moderate performance level with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding, social media presence, and clear domain registration data. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lockrmail.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

lockrMail operates in the technology sector, focusing on email privacy and inbox management solutions delivered via a Chrome extension. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting individual users concerned with email privacy and efficiency. The company was founded in 2020 and maintains a small business profile. Its market position is niche, leveraging unique features like email masking and discount alerts to differentiate from traditional email providers. The company maintains active social media channels and uses standard digital marketing and analytics tools. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a lean operational model relying on web forms for communication.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are found, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The integration of third-party tracking and advertising scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced domain security, security headers, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user privacy compliance.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
lockrMail
Description
The lockrMail Chrome extension integrates the utility of email into your browsing experience.
Key services
Email masking, Inbox filtering and management, Discount alerts, Order tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, AdRoll, GSAP, Bootstrap, Axios
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Chrome Extension
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, AdRoll
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based marketing site for a Chrome extension product
  2. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via web form only
  3. No explicit cookie consent banner or cookie policy detected
  4. Social media presence is active with official accounts linked
  5. Google OAuth integration for signup is implemented
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. No DNSSEC enabled on domain
  9. HTTPS is enforced with valid SSL
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and GSAP, and uses Bootstrap for responsive design. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure, indicated by the DNS nameservers. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and AdRoll for retargeting. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. The site uses a Chrome extension as its primary product platform, with OAuth integration for Google sign-up flows. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lockrmail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lockrmail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.