Skip to main content

Security report for lnsssports.lv

Latvijas Neredzīgo sporta savienība · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Neredzīgo sporta savienība (LNSS) is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to uniting and supporting active, sports-oriented individuals with visual impairments. The organization collaborates with international bodies such as IBSA and the European Blind Sports Association to promote integration through sports. LNSS offers a variety of adapted sports activities, organizes events and championships, and fosters community engagement. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with multilingual support and accessibility features. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, ensuring a good user experience and SEO optimization. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy policy found. Overall, LNSS presents a credible and trustworthy digital front for its mission, though WHOIS data is unavailable for full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lnsssports.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LNSS occupies a niche market segment as a non-profit sports organization serving visually impaired individuals in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus, official collaborations, and community-driven approach. The business model centers on volunteerism, event organization, and partnerships with governmental and international bodies. Revenue streams likely include grants, sponsorships, and donations. The target audience includes visually impaired athletes, volunteers, and supporters. Growth indicators include active event calendars and multimedia content showcasing ongoing activities. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving recognized sports and disability organizations. Strategic observations suggest LNSS could benefit from enhanced digital security and clearer privacy documentation to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA protecting user input forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps include missing explicit privacy policies and incident response information. Data protection practices appear basic, with cookie consent implemented but no visible data retention policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content. Enhancing security headers, documenting privacy and incident response policies, and maintaining up-to-date software would improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and retention.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Latvijas Neredzīgo sporta savienība
Registration number
40008023251
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Neredzīgo sporta savienība
Description
Pulcējam vienkopus aktīvus, sportiskus cilvēkus ar redzes traucējumiem Latvijā
Key services
Organizing sports events and championships, Promoting various adapted sports, Providing information and support for athletes, Community engagement and volunteer coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Easy Fancybox, WPForms Lite, Zeno Font Resizer, Cookie Notice plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit sports organization site for visually impaired individuals in Latvia.
  2. Content is well-structured with multiple sections including news, sports types, calendar, multimedia, contacts, and supporters.
  3. Good use of accessibility features and language options (Latvian, English, Russian).
  4. Contact information is comprehensive with emails, phone numbers, physical address, and contact form with reCAPTCHA.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy compliance.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  7. No visible advanced security headers; SSL is properly configured.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain legitimacy cannot be fully verified.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and various plugins such as Yoast SEO for optimization and WPForms for user input. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features including font resizing and color contrast options. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking and includes a cookie consent banner for compliance. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy documentation represent modernization opportunities. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lnsssports.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lnsssports.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.