Skip to main content

Security report for lnk-industries.lv

AS LNK INDUSTRIES · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LNK Industries is a Latvian construction and infrastructure company with over 30 years of experience, specializing in industrial, commercial, residential, and marine hydraulic projects. The company positions itself as a regional leader in Baltic infrastructure development, offering comprehensive project management from design to completion. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring a modern tech stack and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR consent banner. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification, but the business information and social media presence support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lnk-industries.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lnk-industries.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
2
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-12-12 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lnk-industries.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.lnk-industries.lv2025-12-12
  • –webmail.lnk-industries.lv2025-12-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LNK Industries operates in the transportation and real estate sectors, focusing on large-scale infrastructure projects such as bridges, tunnels, and ports. Their business model is project-based construction with internal production capabilities and a skilled workforce of over 100 specialists. The company targets public and private sector clients in the Baltic region, leveraging a strong portfolio of significant projects to maintain market leadership. Their digital presence includes active social media channels and a content-rich website, supporting brand visibility and client engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is available. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS LNK INDUSTRIES
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS LNK INDUSTRIES
Description
LNK Industries is a Latvian company specializing in construction and infrastructure projects, with over 30 years of experience. They focus on industrial, commercial, residential, and marine hydraulic construction projects, including bridges, tunnels, and cultural venues.
Key services
Industrial and commercial construction, Residential building construction, Engineering structures (bridges, tunnels, networks), Marine hydraulic structures (ports, piers, terminals)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.18.0-dev1, jQuery 3.6.0, Swiper.js, Google Fonts (Manrope), Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated libraries and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No visible security or WAF blocking mechanisms detected.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Company presents as a medium-sized construction and infrastructure firm in Latvia.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook supports business legitimacy.
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Elementor 3.18.0-dev1, using modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and jQuery 3.6.0. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are integrated for typography and analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of images and scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lnk-industries.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lnk-industries.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.