Skip to main content

Security report for ljp.lv

Biedrība „Latvijas Jaunatnes padome” · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Jaunatnes padome (LJP) is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 1992, serving as the largest youth energy network in Latvia. It supports 55 youth organizations across the country, fostering a civic and supportive environment for young people. The organization offers services including training on participation, support for youth NGOs, and mentoring. The website reflects a professional and community-focused entity with clear contact information and official registration details. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, YouTube embeds, Google Maps API, and Google reCaptcha for security. It uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and includes a CSRF token, indicating attention to security. However, the absence of certain security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement in security maturity. The security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though GDPR compliance could be enhanced with more detailed disclosures. The website is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Overall, the risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or suspicious content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and improving privacy transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ljp.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LJP holds a strong market position as the leading youth network in Latvia, leveraging its extensive membership base of 55 youth organizations. Its business model is centered on non-profit advocacy, support, and capacity building for youth organizations. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, as indicated by donation prompts and bank details. The target audience is primarily youth and youth organizations in Latvia, with a focus on civic engagement and participation. The organization maintains an active partnership ecosystem, including links to European Commission projects and other youth initiatives. The website content and social media presence support community engagement and transparency. Growth indicators include recent events and projects highlighted on the site. The organization's operations appear stable and community-oriented, with a clear mission and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with a valid SSL certificate, and a CSRF token is present, which protects against cross-site request forgery. The use of Google reCaptcha helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed but could be improved with more detailed privacy disclosures and data retention policies. The security score is good but could be elevated by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy policy details to include data retention periods, user rights, and third-party data sharing to improve GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība „Latvijas Jaunatnes padome”
Registration number
40008012686
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība „Latvijas Jaunatnes padome”
Description
Latvijas Jaunatnes padome (LJP) ir 1992. gadā dibināta organizācija, kas iekļauj un atbalsta 55 jauniešu organizācijas no Latvijas un veicina jauniešiem ērtas un pilsoniski atbildīgas vides veidošanu Latvijā.
Key services
Support and inclusion of youth organizations, Training on participation and involvement in society, Support activities for youth NGOs, Consultations and mentoring
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, YouTube embed, Google Maps API, Google reCaptcha, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Use of Google reCaptcha

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with official registration number and physical address.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and Google services for analytics and maps.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is youth-focused and non-profit.
  8. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional HTTP security headers and explicit security policies.
  9. Branding is consistent but some placeholder images are present.
  10. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Google Fonts for typography, embedded YouTube videos for multimedia content, and Google Maps API for location services. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with some placeholder images indicating potential content gaps or ongoing development. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic accessibility features such as font size control and contrast modes. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but could be improved with structured data and richer metadata. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site uses client-side JavaScript for dynamic content and redirects. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's needs but could benefit from further optimization and modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ljp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ljp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.