Skip to main content

Security report for livin.lv

LIVIN · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIVIN is an e-commerce retailer specializing in ecological and natural products including food, cosmetics, and household chemicals, primarily serving the Latvian market. The website is professionally designed with good SEO and mobile optimization, supporting multiple languages for regional markets including Estonia and Lithuania. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Clerk.io, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and several security headers present, though improvements in Content-Security-Policy and explicit privacy and terms pages are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but website content and technical indicators suggest a legitimate business. Overall, LIVIN presents a moderate risk profile with room for enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching livin.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LIVIN operates in the retail sector focusing on organic and ecological products, targeting health-conscious consumers in Latvia and neighboring Baltic countries. The business model is e-commerce retail with a regional presence supported by sister sites in Lithuania and Estonia. The company leverages third-party marketing and analytics services to drive customer engagement and retargeting. The lack of explicit contact and corporate information on the website reduces transparency but does not negate the apparent market positioning as a regional organic product retailer. Growth opportunities include expanding privacy compliance, improving direct customer contact channels, and enhancing security disclosures to build trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements several security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and X-Content-Type-Options, contributing to a solid baseline security posture. However, the Content-Security-Policy header appears partial and could be strengthened to mitigate cross-site scripting risks. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, and no explicit incident response contacts are provided, indicating gaps in security transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages, which may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced policy publication and vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked from the homepage.
  2. Enhance the Content-Security-Policy header to cover all script sources and mitigate XSS vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and marketing tools for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIVIN
Description
Eko veikals LIVIN piedāvā plašu ekoloģisko produktu klāstu – pārtiku, kosmētiku, sadzīves ķīmiju un citas preces Tavai ikdienai. Iepērcies jau šodien!
Key services
Online sales of ecological food products, Cosmetics, Household chemicals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Clerk.io
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Clerk.io, Soundest
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform specializing in ecological and natural products in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with alternate language versions for Estonia and Lithuania.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age information extracted.
  8. Security headers are partially implemented; CSP header is present but incomplete.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. No data protection officer contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end framework (Vue.js) and integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics services such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Clerk.io. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times due to multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical stack supports a scalable e-commerce platform but requires ongoing maintenance to manage third-party dependencies and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with livin.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review livin.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.