Skip to main content

Security report for litra.ch

LITRA · Transportation · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LITRA is a well-established Swiss association dedicated to public transportation, with nearly 90 years of history and over 200 members. The organization provides comprehensive information services, advocacy, publications, and events focused on the public transport sector in Switzerland. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting stakeholders such as transport companies, policymakers, and the general public interested in sustainable mobility solutions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Mailchimp for newsletter management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture and compliance with privacy regulations, though it could benefit from enhanced security policies and incident response disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching litra.ch

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LITRA holds a significant position in the Swiss public transportation sector as a non-profit association advocating for sustainable and future-oriented transport policies. Its business model revolves around membership services, information dissemination, and event organization. The organization leverages its long-standing history and network to influence transport policy and support its members. The website content and structure support these goals effectively, providing news, publications, and data portals. The presence of testimonials and high-profile event coverage (including federal government involvement) enhances credibility. The organization targets transport companies, policymakers, and industry professionals, positioning itself as a key player in Swiss public transport advocacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could limit transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The use of third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve by adopting additional security best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure they are up to date and free from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or bot detection mechanisms to prevent abuse of contact and subscription forms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LITRA
Description
Die LITRA setzt sich als Verband für den öffentlichen Verkehr in der Schweiz ein. Und das seit fast 90 Jahren. Für unsere über 200 Mitglieder stehen wir ein für eine ganzheitliche, lösungsorientierte und zukunftsgerichtete Verkehrspolitik.
Key services
Informationsdienst für öffentlichen Verkehr, Verkehrspolitische Interessenvertretung, Publikationen und Studien, Veranstaltungen und Preisverleihungen (Prix LITRA), Datenportal
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language targeting Swiss public transport stakeholders.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. Use of Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp for analytics and marketing.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, address, and contact form.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content; potential area for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript and CSS, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Mailchimp for newsletter management. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly identified. The site could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced form protections. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with litra.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review litra.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.