Skip to main content

Security report for liquid-themes.com

Liquid Themes · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liquid Themes is a London-based creative agency specializing in comprehensive web solutions including hosting, web design, premium support, and maintenance services. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking tailored website packages and digital presence management. Their market position is that of a niche service provider with a focus on user-centric and sustainable digital experiences. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Bootstrap frameworks, hosted with Cloudflare DNS, and secured with HTTPS. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with SSL and domain registration protections but lacks security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liquid-themes.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates on a service-based business model offering packaged web design and support services. Their revenue streams likely include sales of website packages, premium support subscriptions, and maintenance contracts. The target customer segment includes small to medium businesses and individuals needing web presence solutions. The company leverages testimonials and Trustpilot branding as trust signals. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include a domain age consistent with the founding year and a professional web presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security policies to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections against unauthorized changes. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is partial, with no cookie consent or explicit data protection officer information. The security culture appears basic, suitable for a small agency but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit GDPR compliance statements
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website
  5. Conduct a privacy audit to ensure full compliance with applicable data protection regulations
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liquid Themes
Description
London based creative agency specialized in complete web solutions from hosting to web design. Provides all-in-one web solutions tailored to businesses, including website packages, premium support, and maintenance services.
Key services
Full Package Website, Premium Support, Site Maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap, Redux Framework, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Bootstrap
  2. Content is business-focused with clear service offerings
  3. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Domain uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled
  8. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML
  10. Site navigation is clear and consistent
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap CSS framework, indicating a modern and flexible tech stack. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing some performance and security benefits. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations. Technical debt appears low with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO, accessibility features, and implement security best practices to reduce risks and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liquid-themes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liquid-themes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.