Linstow Baltic is a leading real estate developer in the Baltic region, focusing on property development, sustainable projects, and offering available commercial spaces. The company positions itself as a major player in the real estate market with a professional online presence that targets investors, tenants, and property buyers. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as jQuery, Slick Slider, and integrates analytics tools like Matomo and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54
Not counted
Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention linstowbaltic.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for linstowbaltic.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates primarily in the real estate sector, offering property development and management services. It maintains partnerships such as the Linstow Art Award with the Latvian Academy of Arts, indicating community engagement and brand strengthening. The business model revolves around property development and leasing, targeting commercial and residential markets in Latvia and the Baltic states. The website content and structure support a large enterprise with a focus on sustainability and innovation. The presence of professional contact details and social media links enhances credibility. Growth indicators include recent news about new projects and energy-saving initiatives.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of visible security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. Analytics usage is moderate, with Matomo and Google Tag Manager scripts present, requiring ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could be strengthened with additional controls and documentation.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible reporting and trust.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Linstow Baltic
Description
Baltijas vadošais nekustamo īpašumu attīstītājs Linstow Baltic, kas nodarbojas ar nekustamo īpašumu attīstību, piedāvājot īpašumus, projektus, ilgtspēju un pieejamās platības.
Key services
Īpašumu attīstība, Projekti, Ilgtspēja, Pieejamās platības nomai
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Slider, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lightbox PhotoSwipe
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics
Analytics and tracking
Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a professionally designed WordPress site focused on real estate development in the Baltic region.
Content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate language available.
Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in the footer as PDFs.
Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided in the footer.
No visible forms on the homepage; no direct data collection forms detected in the HTML content.
Use of Matomo and Google Tag Manager indicates moderate analytics and tracking.
No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages detected.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no DNSSEC info found.
No WAF or security blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, using jQuery 3.7.1 and Slick Slider for interactive elements. It employs Matomo for analytics and Google Tag Manager for tag management, indicating a modern but standard technology stack. The site uses responsive design with CSS grid and flexbox, providing good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some heavy images in sliders that may impact load times. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML present but could be improved. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with linstowbaltic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linstowbaltic.lv.