Skip to main content

Security report for linstow.lv

Linstow Baltic · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linstow Baltic is a leading real estate developer in the Baltic region, focusing on property development, office space leasing, and sustainable urban environments. The company positions itself as a major player in the Latvian and Baltic real estate market, targeting investors, tenants, and the general public interested in quality living and working spaces. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern web technologies including jQuery, Slick Slider, and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data, though the absence of security headers suggests room for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, supporting good privacy practices. Overall, the site reflects a professional business presence with clear contact information and partner links, though WHOIS data unavailability limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linstow.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention linstow.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for linstow.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a focus on property development and management in the Baltic states. It leverages partnerships such as the Linstow Art Award program to enhance brand presence and community engagement. The business model centers on developing and leasing commercial and residential properties, with an emphasis on sustainability. The website content and structure target property investors, tenants, and stakeholders in the Baltic real estate market. The presence of a LinkedIn profile and professional branding supports a credible market position. Growth indicators include recent news about new projects and sustainability initiatives. The company appears to maintain a solid partnership ecosystem and a clear market focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. The use of third-party analytics and tag management tools is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are found, indicating potential gaps in security transparency. The site does not expose forms on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing terms of service and incident response contact information to improve legal and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linstow Baltic
Description
Baltijas vadošais nekustamo īpašumu attīstītājs, kas nodarbojas ar nekustamo īpašumu attīstību un apsaimniekošanu, piedāvājot biroju telpas, projektus un ilgtspējīgas risinājumus.
Key services
Nekustamo īpašumu attīstība, Biroju telpu nomas pakalpojumi, Ilgtspējīgas attīstības risinājumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Slider, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lightbox PhotoSwipe
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a Baltic real estate developer.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate language available.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in footer.
  4. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided in footer.
  5. No visible forms on the homepage to collect user data.
  6. Use of Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.1, using jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive elements. Analytics are managed via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of technical sophistication. The site uses responsive design and includes SEO optimizations such as meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. No signs of outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linstow.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linstow.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.