Skip to main content

Security report for linki.la

Linkila Technologies Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linkila Technologies Inc. operates a technology platform specializing in deep linking and link management solutions, targeting digital marketers and businesses requiring enhanced link marketing capabilities. The company, founded in 2020, offers SaaS-based services including bio link deep linking and marketing integrations. The website content analyzed is a 404 error page, but the overall site branding and structure indicate a focused technology business with a niche market position. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS, and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Ackee. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, uses HTTPS, and includes marketing widgets such as Trustpilot. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No CMS or major frameworks were detected on this page. From a security perspective, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with protective domain statuses and no privacy protection masking registrant data. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and some recommended security headers. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found on this page. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security best practices and privacy compliance. The business credibility is supported by consistent branding and domain legitimacy. The 404 page content limits full content quality assessment but does not indicate any malicious or unsafe content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linki.la

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Linkila Technologies Inc. is positioned as a small technology company offering SaaS solutions in link management and marketing tools. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized deep linking services for bio links and marketing use cases. The business model focuses on subscription-based software services targeting digital marketers and social media users. Growth indicators include active marketing integrations and use of analytics tools. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and domain registration transparency. Partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer/update protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security maturity. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The company should enhance security policies, implement DNSSEC, and improve privacy compliance to strengthen its security culture and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linkila Technologies Inc.
Description
Linkila provides a platform focused on deep linking solutions, bio links, and related marketing tools.
Key services
DeepLink for Bio Links, Link management, Marketing integrations
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Trustpilot widget, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Ackee analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ackee
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ackee
Marketing tools
Trustpilot widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The analyzed page is a 404 error page indicating the requested resource is not found.
  2. The website uses modern web fonts and includes marketing and analytics scripts.
  3. No forms are present on the 404 page; no data collection observed here.
  4. Contact information is limited to an email link in the footer.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected on this page.
  6. The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on this page.
  8. The website content is minimal on this page but overall branding is consistent.
  9. No adult or unsafe content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but minimal tech stack including Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, and JavaScript-based analytics and marketing widgets. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data detected. No CMS or major frameworks were identified on this 404 page. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linki.la. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linki.la.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.