Skip to main content

Security report for linijas.lv

SIA LABERS · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA LABERS is a small Latvian company specializing in road marking and parking lot equipment installation services. Their website presents a clear business focus on providing high-quality horizontal road markings using modern materials and technologies, targeting entrepreneurs, private individuals, and industrial clients. The company emphasizes durability and quality in their service offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as LayerSlider and Visual Composer, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in security and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linijas.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on niche services related to road marking and parking lot equipment in Latvia. Their business model is service-oriented, catering to local businesses and private clients requiring territory improvement and road marking solutions. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The absence of social media and limited external partnerships indicates a localized market presence. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts in construction and industrial sectors. The company maintains a straightforward online presence with a gallery showcasing past work, supporting credibility. Growth potential may be limited by the niche focus and lack of digital marketing sophistication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability scanning or incident response policies is found. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected from the provided scripts. Compliance with GDPR is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy further limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to address GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to latest versions to reduce vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and usability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA LABERS
Registration number
40103316303
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA LABERS
Description
SIA “Labers” offers and provides high-quality parking lot horizontal marking and painting services in the road construction and building sector, as well as for entrepreneurs and private individuals in territory improvement processes. They use high-quality materials and modern technologies to achieve durable coatings.
Key services
Road horizontal marking with paint and plastic, Parking lot marking, Pedestrian crossing painting, Directional arrows, symbols, numbers marking, Sports fields and bike lanes painting, Industrial and logistics area zoning, Indoor zoning in warehouses and production areas, Installation of parking equipment (speed bumps, wheel stops, mirrors, signs)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, LayerSlider 6.3.0, Slider Revolution 5.4.3.1, Visual Composer 5.1.1, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Fonts (Raleway, Roboto, Lato), Contact Form 7 4.8, Timetable plugin, Font Awesome, Elegant Icons, Linea Icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based small business site for road marking services in Latvia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No social media links detected on the site.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress plugins.
  7. Gallery section contains multiple images related to business services.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for direct user data collection.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML content.
  10. No evidence of security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an older WordPress version (4.9.26) with popular plugins like LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, and Visual Composer, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts and Google Maps API enhances visual appeal and functionality. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and screen reader text present but no advanced features. SEO is basic, with meta tags and canonical links but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks modern security headers and advanced analytics or tracking tools. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linijas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linijas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.