Skip to main content

Security report for lindar.com

Lindar Media · Technology · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindar Media is a technology company specializing in innovative, data-driven online casino products and gaming technology. With a global team of over 70 employees, Lindar operates award-winning platforms such as MrQ and game development studios like Goosicorn. The company emphasizes creativity, problem-solving, and a collaborative culture. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Next.js, React, and Strapi CMS, hosted under a reputable registrar with DNS managed by Google Cloud. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or privacy policies are published. The site is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, Lindar presents a professional and credible online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and DNS security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindar.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lindar.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lindar.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lindar holds a strong market position in the online casino and gaming technology sector, leveraging data-driven design and technology to deliver customer-centric products. Their business model includes operating online casino platforms, developing casino games, and providing real-time data aggregation and customer experience tools. The company targets online casino players and technology professionals, with a clear focus on innovation and growth. Partnerships and subsidiaries such as MrQ and Goosicorn enhance their ecosystem. The presence of detailed job listings and multiple office locations indicates a growing and structured organization.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions, reflecting a solid baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response plans indicate areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to strengthen DNS security and transparency around security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lindar Media
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindar Media
Description
Lindar is a technology company focused on creating innovative, data-driven, customer-centric products, primarily in the online casino and gaming sector. They emphasize creativity, problem-solving, and a 'work smart, play hard' culture. The company operates globally with a team of 70+ people and offers award-winning products and cutting-edge software.
Key services
Online casino platform (MrQ), Casino game development (Goosicorn), Real-time data aggregation platform (PQ), Customer experience platform (Spark), Content management system (Flicker)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Redux, JavaScript, TypeScript, Node.js, Java, Spring, MongoDB, Kafka, Redis, Kubernetes, GTM, GA4
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI, Strapi CMS
Platforms
Web, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status prevents unauthorized transfer and deletion

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager (GTM), Google Analytics 4 (GA4)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. Content is focused on technology and online casino products with detailed job listings.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Multiple external domains linked, including subsidiaries and partner sites.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Chakra UI for frontend, with backend technologies such as Java, Spring, Node.js, and MongoDB. The CMS is Strapi, indicating a headless CMS approach. Hosting and DNS are managed via reputable providers. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The technical stack supports scalability and modern development practices, though continuous monitoring for technical debt and security updates is advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.