Skip to main content

Security report for limobee.com

LimoBee · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LimoBee is a German-based digital platform specializing in chauffeur and limousine transport services. The company offers a native app and web platform enabling passengers to book transfer rides with professional limousine services across multiple German cities. Their business model focuses on streamlining the booking, offer acceptance, payment, and management processes for both passengers and service providers. The website reflects a mature business with a domain registered since 2007 and a clear regional market presence. Technically, the site is built on Angular 14, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as Google Maps API and Hotjar for analytics and user experience insights. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements are recommended in DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the transportation sector in Germany.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching limobee.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention limobee.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for limobee.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LimoBee targets passengers and chauffeur service providers in Germany, offering a digital marketplace and management solution for limousine rides. Their competitive advantage lies in the native app availability, direct communication features, and digital payment options including credit cards and Klarna. The company partners with reputable organizations and has a visible contact person enhancing trust. Revenue likely derives from service fees or commissions on bookings. The platform supports multiple German cities, indicating growth and regional expansion. The business operates in the transportation sector with a focus on digital transformation of traditional chauffeur services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are areas for improvement. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar introduces moderate tracking but no apparent privacy violations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with EU cookie laws and GDPR requirements.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LimoBee
Description
Mit LimoBee können Chauffeur- und Transportdienstleistungen digital über eine App gebucht werden, ein Angebot erhalten, angenommen und bezahlen werden. Dienstleistungsunternehmen können die Geschäftsprozesse einfach und modern digitalisieren, vom Kundenaustausch und der Auftragserfassung bis zur Fahrtenverteilung und Rechnungsstellung.
Key services
Transferfahrten buchen, Angebote erhalten und annehmen, Digitale Zahlung, Fahrtenmanagement für Dienstleistungsunternehmen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 14, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Hotjar, Material Icons, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and Google Tag Manager usage)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks with built-in security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German with professional presentation.
  3. Business focuses on digital limousine and chauffeur services in Germany.
  4. Multiple city-specific service pages indicate regional coverage.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with a named contact person.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 14, a modern and robust front-end framework, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. It integrates Google Maps API for location autocomplete and mapping features, enhancing usability. Hosting appears to be supported by Google Cloud DNS services, with domain registration via Squarespace Domains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but present, with room for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical URLs. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though enabling DNSSEC and security headers would further strengthen the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with limobee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review limobee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.