Skip to main content

Security report for lift24.pl

Lift24 · Transportation · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lift24 is a Polish company specializing in the rental, sale, and servicing of mini construction cranes, targeting construction professionals primarily in Warsaw and Poznań. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The site includes SEO optimizations and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and security headers in place, but lacks published security policies or incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy and contact transparency to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lift24.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lift24 operates in the transportation sector focusing on niche construction equipment. Its business model combines equipment rental, sales, and maintenance services, catering to a regional market in Poland. The company appears small-sized with a founding year of 2019, consistent with domain registration data. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting business credibility. However, the absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit customer confidence and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and standard security headers, indicating a baseline security posture. The presence of a cookie consent banner shows awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Enhancing security documentation and contact channels would improve the security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and themes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lift24
Description
Wynajem mini żurawi budowlanych to rozwiązanie umożliwiające szybkie i bezbłędne wykonanie określonych prac montażowych. Lift24 Warszawa, Poznań. Zapraszamy!
Key services
rental of mini construction cranes, sales of mini construction cranes, service and maintenance of mini cranes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Fuse Social Floating Sidebar, Supreme Modules Pro for Divi, TablePress
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieYes.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information not explicitly found in provided HTML.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  7. Website content is in Polish and targets Polish construction market.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and uses several popular plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Yoast SEO, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses jQuery libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The technical implementation includes SEO best practices and cookie consent integration. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security documentation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the data. Overall, the technical stack is modern but could benefit from ongoing maintenance and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lift24.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lift24.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.