Skip to main content

Security report for lifetreecheck.eu

Nadace Partnerství · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIFE Tree Check is a non-profit environmental project coordinated by Nadace Partnerství, focused on helping Central European cities adapt to climate change by strengthening green infrastructure. The website serves as an educational and resource platform offering applications, publications, and inspirational content to municipalities and the public. The project is supported by the EU LIFE program and partners across multiple countries, positioning it as a reputable initiative in the climate adaptation sector. Technically, the site is built on Kentico CMS with ASP.NET WebForms, leveraging modern web technologies like jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and rich content in Czech. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, but the site’s legitimacy is supported by its association with a known non-profit and EU funding. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lifetreecheck.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lifetreecheck.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lifetreecheck.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project targets municipalities and stakeholders in Central Europe concerned with climate adaptation, offering tools and knowledge to mitigate urban heat island effects. Its business model is non-profit, funded by grants and partnerships, with a strong emphasis on education and community engagement. The presence of multiple partner organizations and EU backing indicates a solid partnership ecosystem. The website’s content and services suggest a focus on sustainable urban development and environmental resilience, with growth potential tied to increasing climate change awareness. The project’s market position is strong within the non-profit environmental sector, leveraging digital tools and publications to extend its reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadace Partnerství
Registration number
457 73 521
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Partnerství
Description
Projekt LIFE Tree Check pomáhá městům ve střední Evropě účinně čelit dopadům klimatické změny posilováním zelené infrastruktury ve městech.
Key services
poradenství obcím, vývoj aplikací Tree Check App a Tree Check Pro, publikace a vzdělávací materiály, inspirace a databáze adaptačních opatření
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Kentico CMS, lazysizes (lazy loading images)
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. Strong focus on climate adaptation and green infrastructure for cities.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No contact phone numbers found; only email and postal address provided.
  7. Multiple social media profiles linked (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter).
  8. Website uses Kentico CMS and ASP.NET WebForms technology stack.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (Kentico) using ASP.NET WebForms technology, which may indicate some legacy components but also stable enterprise-grade infrastructure. It uses common libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome, and implements lazy loading for images to improve performance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, integrated with a cookie consent mechanism for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing scripts and leveraging modern front-end frameworks. The technical stack supports the site’s content-rich and interactive features effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lifetreecheck.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lifetreecheck.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.