Skip to main content

Security report for liferacing.com

Life Racing · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Life Racing is a specialized company founded in 2002, providing advanced electronics solutions primarily for professional motor racing, automotive OEMs, and military applications. Their product portfolio includes engine control units, power distribution units, display units, paddle shift systems, and wiring harnesses. The company operates globally with dealers and distributors across Europe, the USA, Asia, and New Zealand. The website reflects a focused B2B business model targeting professional motorsport and automotive sectors. Technically, the website employs standard modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Font Awesome. It features responsive design elements and a clear navigation structure, although some SEO and accessibility features could be enhanced. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows basic good practices like HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, Life Racing's website is professional and functional with good content quality and business credibility. However, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 11 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liferacing.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Life Racing holds a niche position in the motorsport and automotive electronics market, leveraging specialized product offerings and services such as track support and custom electronic design. Their global dealer network supports international reach. The business model is focused on B2B relationships with professional teams and OEMs, emphasizing quality and reliability. The company’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance features to strengthen customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking comprehensive security headers and explicit security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which limits readiness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from implementing best practices such as CSP headers, security.txt files, and clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure pages with contact information.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and scripts to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Life Racing
Description
Life Racing provides specialist electronics for professional motor racing, OEM automotive suppliers, and military applications. They design, manufacture, develop, and support products including engine control units (ECUs), power distribution units (PDUs), display units, integrated paddle shift systems, and wiring harnesses.
Key services
Design and manufacture of ECUs, Power distribution units, Display units, Integrated paddle shift systems, Wiring harness solutions, Track support, Electronic design, Software, Wiring services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and product/service information.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via forms.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Font Awesome icons. It employs Slick Carousel for sliders and responsive design techniques. The site is moderately performant and mobile-optimized but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be modernized with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liferacing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liferacing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.