Skip to main content

Security report for life.be

LIFE · Real Estate · Belgium

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIFE is a Belgian real estate developer focused on creating sustainable, community-oriented living spaces that prioritize quality of life and architectural detail. Their projects emphasize energy efficiency and social inclusiveness, targeting residents and investors interested in innovative urban development. The website reflects a professional digital presence with multimedia content, clear navigation, and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for improvement. WHOIS data is restricted by the registry, limiting transparency but not necessarily indicating risk. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for enhanced security and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching life.be

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LIFE holds a solid position in the Belgian real estate market, focusing on sustainable and socially responsible development. Their business model revolves around mixed-use projects combining housing, sports, and care facilities, appealing to diverse demographics including students and elderly residents. The company leverages digital channels including social media and a news feed to engage stakeholders. Absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor limitation but common in privacy-conscious domains. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of third-party analytics (Pirsch) and Google Tag Manager is transparent and managed with user consent. Overall, security maturity is moderate with opportunities for improvement in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct contact information for security or abuse reporting to improve incident handling.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIFE
Description
LIFE Developers create and transform spaces with a human approach, focusing on quality of life, architectural detail, and community connection. They develop unique living environments emphasizing sustainability and social inclusiveness.
Key services
Real estate development, Sustainable housing projects, Community-focused urban planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG, HTML5, CSS3, Video HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Pirsch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pirsch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to registry restrictions.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. Includes tracking via Pirsch analytics and Google Tag Manager.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  9. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  10. Social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, including SVG icons and embedded video content. It uses asynchronous loading for scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Pirsch analytics, optimizing performance. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features like skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but could be enhanced with structured data (JSON-LD) which is absent. No hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and enhanced SEO practices are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with life.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review life.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.