Skip to main content

Security report for lidojumiem.lv

ARKA Group SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lidojumiem.lv is a specialized legal service provider operating under ARKA Group SIA, focusing on tourism, passenger rights, immigration, and transport law in Latvia. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of services including contract law, GDPR compliance, dispute resolution, and licensing support. The target audience includes tourism industry professionals, travelers, and entities involved in air and ground transport. The business operates as a small legal consultancy with a niche market position in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Jetpack and Google Analytics integration, employing modern web technologies and custom fonts. The site is mobile-optimized and offers good SEO and accessibility basics. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and formal security policies reduces the overall security maturity. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent and detailed GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with a good balance of business credibility and technical implementation. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices, which can be improved to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lidojumiem.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company ARKA Group SIA leverages its expertise in tourism and transport law to serve a specialized market segment in Latvia. Its business model centers on providing legal consultancy and representation tailored to the travel and immigration sectors. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its niche specialization and comprehensive service offerings including passenger rights and immigration permits. The website’s content and social media presence indicate active engagement with clients and stakeholders. Revenue streams likely derive from legal services and consultations. The company maintains a consistent brand image and demonstrates moderate digital maturity, with opportunities to expand its online presence and compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no evident exposure of sensitive information. The use of WordPress and Jetpack plugins is standard but requires vigilant updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The site does not provide vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which are recommended for transparency and security culture. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small legal consultancy but can be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to foster a security-aware culture and facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARKA Group SIA
Description
Legal services specializing in tourism, passenger rights, immigration, and transport law with expertise in contracts, GDPR, consumer rights, dispute resolution, corporate law, intellectual property, licensing, and employment law.
Key services
Legal consultancy in tourism and transport, Immigration legal services, Passenger rights and compensation, Contract drafting and dispute resolution, GDPR compliance, Licensing and registration support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Jetpack plugin, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google Site Kit, Custom fonts (Beiruti, Literata), Modern JavaScript modules
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern WordPress and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to legal services in tourism and transport
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; contact is via email and phone
  4. Social media presence across multiple platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter (X), Threads, and YouTube
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners visible on homepage
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no suspicious indicators found in HTML
  7. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins with Google Analytics integration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform version 6.8.2, utilizing Jetpack for enhanced functionality and Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. Custom web fonts (Beiruti and Literata) are used for branding consistency. The site employs modern JavaScript modules and is mobile responsive with good SEO fundamentals. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical enhancement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but can benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lidojumiem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lidojumiem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.