Skip to main content

Security report for lidl.at

Lidl Österreich · Retail · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lidl Österreich operates a comprehensive retail website offering a wide range of products including food, household items, garden supplies, fashion, and more. The site features extensive promotional content, including weekly offers and loyalty programs such as Lidl Plus. The company holds a strong market position in Austria as a leading discount supermarket chain, supported by a consistent and professional brand presence. Technically, the website employs modern technologies like Vue.js and is hosted on a robust infrastructure with Akamai DNS services. However, a critical security issue is the absence of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the site's security posture. Despite this, the site implements several security headers and content security policies, indicating a focus on security best practices. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but must urgently address the SSL deficiency to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lidl.at

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lidl Österreich is positioned as a major retail player in the Austrian market, offering a broad product portfolio and leveraging digital channels for customer engagement and sales. The business model centers on discount retail with an emphasis on local products and weekly promotions. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and partner domains such as Lidl Plus, Lidl Connect, and Lidl Reisen indicates a diversified service offering beyond traditional retail. The company targets a broad consumer base in Austria, focusing on affordability and convenience. The website's content quality and branding consistency reinforce its market leadership and customer trust. The integration of marketing and analytics tools supports data-driven decision-making and targeted advertising, enhancing competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity with several security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and a comprehensive Content Security Policy. These measures help mitigate common web vulnerabilities such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS protocols is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No direct incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and tracking services, which are managed with consent mechanisms, aligning with privacy regulations. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and enhancement of incident response visibility are recommended to elevate security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and properly configure HSTS after SSL deployment to enforce secure connections.
  3. Review and minimize use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' in Content Security Policy to reduce XSS risks.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments, focusing on third-party scripts and dependencies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js 2.6.14, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS for a responsive and accessible user experience. The hosting infrastructure utilizes Akamai DNS services, indicating a reliable and scalable backend. The site includes multiple sliders, carousels, and rich media content, optimized for various screen sizes. However, performance metrics were not provided, limiting assessment of load times. Accessibility features such as focus outlines and semantic HTML elements are present, enhancing usability. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The absence of SSL is a significant technical risk, potentially affecting SEO rankings and user trust. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and robust but requires urgent security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lidl.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lidl.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.