Skip to main content

Security report for libenak.eu

Technická správa komunikací hl. m. Prahy, a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website libenak.eu serves as the official information portal for the extensive reconstruction project of the Libeňský most in Prague, managed by Technická správa komunikací hl. m. Prahy, a.s. It provides detailed updates, project descriptions, and visualizations targeting residents, professionals, and stakeholders interested in the infrastructure development. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, leveraging WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins. Technically, it employs modern web technologies and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding, official partner links, and transparent project information. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and authoritative source for the Libeňský most reconstruction project.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching libenak.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind libenak.eu is a medium-sized public infrastructure entity focused on transportation and urban development in Prague. It operates under public contracts with a Design and Build model, ensuring integrated project delivery. The website reflects a strategic communication channel to inform the public and professionals, enhancing transparency and stakeholder engagement. Partnerships with city authorities and related infrastructure organizations strengthen its market position. The content and digital presence indicate a stable operation with growth potential in urban infrastructure projects. Revenue streams likely stem from public funding and contracts. The site’s ecosystem includes official city and partner domains, reinforcing its legitimacy and operational scope.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Google Tag Manager is implemented asynchronously, reducing performance impact. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency in case of security events. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, indicating limited public engagement on security issues. Overall, the site is secure for general users but could enhance its security maturity by adopting additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Technická správa komunikací hl. m. Prahy, a.s.
Description
Rozsáhlá rekonstrukce Libeňského mostu přes Vltavu a přilehlých komunikací v Praze, včetně výměny trakčního vedení a kolejového svršku pro tramvajovou trať. Projekt zahrnuje také protipovodňová opatření a výstavbu dalších mostních objektů.
Key services
Rekonstrukce mostních objektů, Výstavba a opravy dopravní infrastruktury, Koordinace s Dopravním podnikem hl. m. Prahy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.31.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied by cookie policy)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is dedicated to the reconstruction of Libeňský most in Prague.
  2. Content is in Czech language and professionally presented.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization.
  4. Includes cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  6. No exposed emails or phone numbers directly on the homepage; contact form likely on contact page.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, YouTube.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization. It leverages jQuery and Google Tag Manager for interactivity and analytics. Hosting appears to be managed by INTERNET CZ, a.s., with static assets served from Azure Blob Storage, indicating a hybrid hosting approach. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Some inline styles and scripts are present, but overall code quality is good. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or missing security headers, which should be monitored and updated regularly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with libenak.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review libenak.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.