Skip to main content

Security report for lhpb.de

Lebenshilfe Peine-Burgdorf GmbH · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

30/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lebenshilfe Peine-Burgdorf GmbH is a regional non-profit organization dedicated to supporting people with disabilities and those requiring assistance in the Peine district and surrounding areas in Germany. The organization offers a broad range of services including counseling, childcare, residential support, employment and education programs, and leisure activities. Their business model focuses on social integration and empowerment of their target audience, which includes individuals with special needs, their families, and professional caregivers. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses common web technologies such as Apache server, jQuery, and FontAwesome. While the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, it lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security shortfall. Performance data is unavailable, but the site appears to have good navigation and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly lowers the security posture. Although some security headers are present, key best practices like HSTS enforcement and OCSP stapling are missing. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate business credibility and good content quality but suffers from critical security deficiencies. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS deployment and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lhpb.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
30

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lebenshilfe Peine-Burgdorf GmbH holds a strong regional position as a non-profit social service provider focusing on disability support and integration. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive service offerings spanning counseling, education, residential care, and employment support. The organization targets individuals with disabilities and their families, as well as professionals in the social care sector. Their partnerships with regional organizations such as Lebenshilfe Niedersachsen and Der Paritätische Gesamtverband strengthen their ecosystem. The presence of certifications like AZAV and ISO Sozial indicates commitment to quality and compliance. Growth indicators include ongoing infrastructure projects like the new Kita Igel childcare facility. Revenue streams likely include public funding, donations, and service contracts. The website supports recruitment efforts and community engagement through social media and news updates.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers are implemented, critical features such as HSTS enforcement, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are absent. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected, but the absence of modern TLS protocols is a significant gap. Compliance with GDPR is partial; a privacy policy exists but no cookie consent mechanism or explicit incident response contacts are provided. The organization should prioritize SSL/TLS deployment and enhance transparency around security policies to improve incident response readiness and data protection practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update the website's security headers and TLS configurations to align with best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used content management system, supported by Apache web server. The front-end uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements, and FontAwesome Pro for icons. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation clarity. However, performance metrics are missing, suggesting a lack of monitoring or optimization. The absence of HTTPS is a critical technical deficiency. The DNS setup is standard with no DNSSEC or CAA records enabled, which could be improved for enhanced security. The site uses external CDNs for fonts and scripts but does not employ advanced analytics or marketing tools. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization in security and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lhpb.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lhpb.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.