Skip to main content

Security report for lfz.lv

Labdarības fonds "Zīļuks" · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Labdarības fonds "Zīļuks" is a Latvian non-profit organization established in 2015, dedicated to promoting philanthropy and supporting social welfare projects, primarily focused on creating children's playgrounds in regional towns and villages. The foundation operates through donations and community engagement, targeting families and local communities in Latvia. The website reflects this mission with relevant content and donation mechanisms but lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 7 with legacy JavaScript libraries, which may pose security risks. The presence of HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms indicates basic compliance with privacy standards, though no formal privacy policy or terms of service are published. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lfz.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lfz.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lfz.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche philanthropic position in Latvia, focusing on children's welfare and community development through playground installations. Its business model relies on donations, supported by a clear call to action on the website. The partnership with latts.lv adds credibility. The organization targets local Latvian communities and donors interested in social responsibility. Growth potential lies in expanding its donor base and increasing visibility. The website's content and structure support its mission but lack advanced digital marketing or social media integration, which could enhance outreach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, showing awareness of privacy concerns. However, the use of outdated jQuery 1.8 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are gaps in security maturity. The cookie consent popup complies with basic GDPR requirements but lacks detailed privacy documentation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to reduce risk and enhance compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding ARIA attributes and meta tags for better user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Labdarības fonds "Zīļuks"
Description
Labdarības fonds "Zīļuks" is an independent non-governmental organization established in 2015 to promote philanthropy in Latvia by supporting socially responsible actions and public benefit goals. The foundation focuses on projects that align with its mission to enhance societal welfare, primarily through creating children's playgrounds in Latvian regional towns and villages.
Key services
Funding and establishing children's playgrounds, Supporting social responsibility initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8, Drupal 7, Google Analytics, Colorbox, jCarousel
Frameworks
Drupal 7
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent popup

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a charity foundation focused on children's playgrounds in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear focus on social good.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with a visible popup in Latvian.
  5. Uses Drupal 7 CMS with some outdated libraries.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  7. Contact phone number is partially redacted, limiting confidence.
  8. No email addresses or social media links found.
  9. Partner logo for latts.lv is displayed, indicating partnership.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, which is an older platform but still functional. It uses jQuery 1.8, Google Analytics, Colorbox, and jCarousel for UI and tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and Google Analytics. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by omega media queries. Accessibility is basic with no advanced features detected. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. The site lacks modern security headers and uses legacy JavaScript libraries, indicating technical debt and potential security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lfz.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lfz.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.