Skip to main content

Security report for lfca.earth

Leaders for Climate Action · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leaders for Climate Action is a US-based non-profit organization founded in 2020 that focuses on transforming business leaders into climate leaders and inspiring organizational and societal change to prevent climate catastrophe. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging targeting business leaders interested in sustainability. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, hosted on Netlify, and integrates analytics and error tracking tools like RudderStack and Bugsnag. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal policies such as privacy and cookie policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the site is safe, well-designed, and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lfca.earth

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a niche focus on climate leadership and sustainability advocacy. Its business model revolves around leadership transformation and influencing policy makers and society. The domain age and registration details align with the organization's founding date, indicating legitimacy. The website targets business leaders and organizations aiming to integrate sustainability into their operations. The use of modern web technologies and hosting platforms suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit contact details and compliance documents may impact stakeholder confidence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The site uses third-party analytics and error tracking services, which may raise privacy considerations if not properly disclosed. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, publishing relevant policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to foster transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leaders for Climate Action
Description
Leaders for Climate Action is a non-profit organization that turns business leaders into climate leaders, helps to transform their organizations and inspires them to influence policy makers & society in order to prevent a climate catastrophe.
Key services
Leadership transformation, Organizational transformation, Policy influence, Societal influence
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Ant Design, RudderStack, Bugsnag
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Netlify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4 (via RudderStack)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
RudderStack, Bugsnag
Marketing tools
RudderStack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit focused on climate leadership.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and hosting platform.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based static site generator (Gatsby) and styled with Ant Design components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting on Netlify provides scalability and performance benefits. The site integrates RudderStack for analytics and Bugsnag for error monitoring, reflecting a proactive approach to performance and user experience monitoring. The site appears mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, likely due to external asset loading and script usage. There is no CMS detected, suggesting content is managed via static site generation or headless CMS not evident in the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lfca.earth. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lfca.earth.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.