Skip to main content

Security report for levitrans.cz

LEVITRANS · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEVITRANS is a Czech Republic based small transportation company specializing in international and domestic freight road transport using vans, trucks, and related forwarding services. The company emphasizes express delivery with a 24-hour guarantee, shipment insurance, and GPS tracking. The website presents a professional design with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions, targeting businesses and individuals needing reliable cargo transport within the Czech Republic and the EU. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Fonts, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Security posture is moderate; while no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected, the site lacks visible security headers and explicit HTTPS confirmation from the provided data. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, which may impact user trust and support accessibility. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching levitrans.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight and express delivery services. Its market position is that of a dynamic small business with several years of experience and a commitment to professionalism and reliability. The business model revolves around providing specialized cargo transport and vehicle maintenance services. The presence of client logos from recognized automotive brands suggests established partnerships or service relationships. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and regulatory compliance. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with no evident critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information. However, the absence of security headers and unclear SSL/TLS configuration are notable gaps. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing incident response contacts, indicates limited compliance readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The security culture appears minimal based on publicly available information. Enhancing security headers, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing compliance documents would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify strong TLS configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEVITRANS
Description
Specializes in international and domestic freight road transport using large-volume vans, solo vehicles, and trucks, including related forwarding services. Offers express delivery with a guarantee of delivery within 24 hours, insurance of shipments, and GPS tracking.
Key services
International freight road transport, Domestic freight road transport, Express delivery with 24-hour guarantee, Vehicle maintenance and repair (autoservis), Shipment insurance and GPS tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Bootstrap, jQuery, Swiper, Masonry, Animate.css
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
toplist.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  4. Professional design with clear navigation and service descriptions.
  5. Use of common web technologies and libraries with no outdated or vulnerable versions detected.
  6. No explicit security headers found in the HTML content; SSL status unknown from provided data.
  7. Presence of client logos suggests established business relationships.
  8. No social media links or company contact emails found.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection points identified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Google Fonts for typography. The inclusion of Swiper and Masonry libraries enhances UI interactivity and layout. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or backend technologies are identified from the HTML content. Hosting details are limited to registrar and DNS information. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding security headers and optimizing performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with levitrans.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review levitrans.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.