Skip to main content

Security report for letisteprobudoucnost.cz

Letiště Praha, a. s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Letiště Praha, a. s. operates the Václav Havel Airport Prague and is actively engaged in a modernization project to transform the airport into a sustainable, modern 21st-century facility. The website serves as an informational platform detailing development plans, sustainability efforts, and benefits to the Czech economy and travelers. The company holds a strong market position as the national airport operator and targets Czech travelers, tourists, and business partners. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and professionally designed, offering a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS in use and consent management implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is consistent with the business and domain age aligns with the project timeline. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though improvements in security transparency and contact information are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching letisteprobudoucnost.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a key transportation infrastructure provider in the Czech Republic, focusing on airport modernization and sustainable growth. Its competitive advantage lies in its national importance and strategic development plans including infrastructure expansion, improved passenger services, and environmental commitments. Revenue streams likely include airport operations, retail concessions, and development projects such as Airport City. The target customers are travelers, airlines, and commercial partners. Growth indicators include ongoing infrastructure projects and new service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for careers, official airport information, and development projects, indicating a well-integrated operational environment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent management in place. However, it lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy presence. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing clear security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Letiště Praha, a. s.
Description
Modernizace Letiště Václava Havla Praha s cílem vytvořit udržitelné, komfortní a ekonomicky přínosné národní letiště 21. století.
Key services
Letištní služby, Modernizace infrastruktury, Rozvoj dopravních spojení, Udržitelnost a ekologické iniciativy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot Consent Management, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cookiebot for consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich about airport modernization.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Social media presence is linked and consistent with official airport branding.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as AOS for animations and Slick Carousel for sliders. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by Active24, a known Czech hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and hreflang attributes for Czech and English languages. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and ARIA attributes. Technical risks are low, but the absence of security headers and explicit security policies represent potential gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with letisteprobudoucnost.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review letisteprobudoucnost.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.