Skip to main content

Security report for letiapavi.lv

Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

letiapavi.lv is an e-commerce retail website specializing in large size footwear for women, men, and children primarily targeting customers in Latvia, especially Riga. The site offers a variety of shoe categories including boots, sports shoes, sandals, and custom order products. The business appears to be small-sized and has been operating since at least 2014. The website content is primarily in Latvian with some Russian keywords to reach a bilingual audience. The site uses OpenCart CMS and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap to provide a responsive and user-friendly shopping experience. Contact information includes a clearly displayed phone number and a contact form, but no email addresses or social media links are present.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching letiapavi.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention letiapavi.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for letiapavi.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors with a niche focus on large size shoes, which may provide a competitive advantage in the Latvian market. The presence of a Paysera payment verification meta tag indicates integration with a local payment processor, enhancing trust for local customers. The website includes features for customer accounts, order history, and wishlists, indicating a mature e-commerce setup. However, the lack of visible WHOIS data and limited contact details may affect perceived credibility. The site uses external partners such as kurpirkt.lv and salidzini.lv for product search and price comparison, suggesting some integration with local e-commerce ecosystems.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure e-commerce transactions. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. Forms do not show explicit anti-CSRF tokens, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and limited privacy compliance indicators suggest gaps in GDPR adherence. The use of third-party tracking via HotLog indicates some user tracking but no advanced analytics or retargeting services are detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved significantly by implementing recommended security headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly accessible to increase trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly update all third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Apavi internetā, apavu interneta veikals, liela izmēra apavi pirkt Rīgā, обувь больших размеров купить в Риге
Key services
Online shoe sales, Footwear for women, men, and children, Custom order products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Revolution Slider, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
HotLog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HotLog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce store specializing in large size footwear in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some Russian keywords for targeting bilingual audience.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No visible security headers detected.
  5. HTTPS is enabled but SSL configuration details unknown.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  7. Privacy policy page exists but GDPR compliance is unclear.
  8. Contact phone number is clearly displayed.
  9. No social media links found.
  10. Uses OpenCart CMS with common JS libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on OpenCart CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Revolution Slider. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts loaded over HTTP, which is a minor mixed content risk but does not appear to break functionality. Performance is moderate with multiple image carousels and sliders. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and keywords present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses external domains for fonts, payment verification, and analytics tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small e-commerce site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with letiapavi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review letiapavi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.