Skip to main content

Security report for lenartmeble.pl

Lenart · Retail · Poland

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lenart is a Polish furniture retailer specializing in custom furniture solutions tailored to customer styles and needs. The website presents a professional e-commerce platform built on WordPress with WooCommerce and the Divi theme, targeting a general audience interested in furniture retail. The technical infrastructure includes modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though explicit security and incident response policies are not published. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is functional, moderately optimized, and trustworthy, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lenartmeble.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lenart operates in the retail sector focusing on furniture, with a business model centered on e-commerce sales of custom furniture products. The company appears to be medium-sized, founded around 2021, and primarily serves the Polish market with an English version of the site available. The website's use of advanced marketing and tracking tools indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. However, the absence of visible contact details and formal policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the related English domain. The company could benefit from enhancing its online presence with more comprehensive business and compliance information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of Cookiebot indicates attention to cookie consent and privacy regulations. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency in security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good technical controls but gaps in policy documentation and user communication. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Develop and make publicly available security and incident response policies to demonstrate security governance.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lenart
Description
Meble na miarę Twojego stylu - odkryj nasze meble do Twoich potrzeb. Skomponuj swoje wymarzone wnętrze już teraz!
Key services
Custom furniture manufacturing and sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, WooCommerce, WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern tracking and marketing technologies.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Divi theme.
  6. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  7. No security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and the Divi theme for design. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot, indicating a modern digital marketing approach. The site uses standard SEO practices with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The technical stack is well-supported but could benefit from improved accessibility and more robust privacy and security documentation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified in the content analyzed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lenartmeble.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lenartmeble.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.