a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention lemanagement.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lemanagement.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Le Management operates as a specialized modeling agency in the Scandinavian market, leveraging a multilingual approach to serve diverse regional clients. Their competitive advantage lies in their established presence across multiple key cities and a strong brand identity. Revenue streams likely derive from talent management contracts and client engagements in fashion and media sectors. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with third-party service providers for analytics, marketing, and cookie compliance. Growth indicators include multilingual support and integration of advanced marketing tools. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital maturity and compliance to maintain market leadership.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate to high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and use of reputable analytics tools. However, gaps exist in publicly available security policies and incident response procedures. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating good operational security hygiene. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed cookie disclosures and consent mechanisms. The absence of a security.txt file and incident contact channels limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive communication.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
Add a clear terms of service page to define user and business obligations.
Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for all users.
Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Le Management
Description
Le Management is one of the world’s leading management agencies holding offices in Aarhus, Copenhagen, Stockholm and Hamborg.
Key services
Model management, Talent representation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Cloudflare, Typekit fonts, Klaviyo, Hotjar, WPML Multilingual CMS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent with opt-in
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, Typeform
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories and third-party disclosures.
No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
Multiple languages supported via WPML plugin, indicating international presence.
Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with privacy disclosures.
Website is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies and good SEO practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lemanagement.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lemanagement.dk.