Skip to main content

Security report for lejaslives.lv

Lejaslīves lauku saimniecība · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lejaslīves is a Latvian family-owned agricultural business specializing in fresh asparagus, beekeeping equipment, agricultural tools, and rural cottage rentals. The company operates an e-commerce platform to facilitate online sales and enhance customer experience, supported by EU Recovery Fund financing for digital transformation. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and WooCommerce, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and MailerLite. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided, supporting business credibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS but lacks some advanced security headers, and privacy compliance could be improved with a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the business demonstrates a solid local market position with a focus on quality agricultural products and customer service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lejaslives.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lejaslīves targets local Latvian consumers interested in agriculture and rural tourism, leveraging e-commerce to expand reach. The business benefits from EU funding to modernize sales processes and improve digital presence. Its competitive advantage lies in combining product sales with experiential offerings like cottage rentals. The company maintains active social media channels and uses multiple marketing tools to engage customers. The business model is primarily retail with a small enterprise size. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a trustworthy operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA lejaslīves
VAT number
LV40103185322
Registration number
40103185322
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lejaslīves lauku saimniecība
Description
Mēs esam dabas iedvesmota ģimenes saimniecība. Lejaslīves saimniecībā audzējam sparģeļus, piedāvājam biškopības inventāru, lauksaimniecības aprīkojumu un aicinām atpūsties mūsu īres namiņā dabas vidū.
Key services
Fresh asparagus sales, Beekeeping equipment sales, Agricultural equipment sales, Rental of countryside cottages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Slider Revolution, MailerLite, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by WooCommerce and WordPress standard)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
MailerLite, HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site focused on agricultural products and rural tourism.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multi-language support (Latvian, English, Russian).
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  6. Uses multiple marketing and analytics tools including Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, and MailerLite.
  7. No security headers beyond HTTPS detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, using popular plugins like Slider Revolution and MailerLite. It integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies on third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a small e-commerce business but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lejaslives.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lejaslives.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.