Skip to main content

Security report for leclubdesclubsimmobiliers.org

Le Club des Clubs Immobiliers · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Le Club des Clubs Immobiliers is a French non-profit association that unites over 10,000 real estate professionals from 27 alumni clubs of prestigious French schools and universities. The association organizes annual study trips, conferences, roundtables, and networking events to foster knowledge sharing and professional connections in the real estate sector. The website serves as an informational and event platform for its members and partners. Technically, the site is built on the AssoConnect platform, utilizing common JavaScript libraries and external CDNs. However, the site suffers from a lack of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Cookie consent is properly implemented via Axeptio, and analytics are managed through Google Analytics and RudderStack with user consent. Overall, the site provides good content and user experience but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leclubdesclubsimmobiliers.org

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a strong position within the French real estate professional community, leveraging a large network of alumni clubs from top educational institutions. Its business model focuses on event organization and networking facilitation, supported by partnerships with companies and sponsors. The use of AssoConnect as a platform indicates a reliance on specialized association management software. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly via member login. The partnership with AssoConnect is a critical element of their digital ecosystem. Growth indicators include a long history since 1993 and a consistent schedule of annual events. The association's market niche is well-defined, targeting real estate professionals and alumni networks.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers are implemented, and modern TLS protocols are not enabled. While cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, there is no visible security or incident response policy published. The lack of contact channels for security incidents and no vulnerability disclosure policy further highlight gaps in security governance. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, which is positive, but the fundamental lack of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability that must be addressed immediately to protect user privacy and data integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable outdated protocols.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  6. Improve website performance by optimizing resources and reducing load times.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and mobile responsiveness for better user experience.
  8. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) to improve SEO and content discoverability.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the AssoConnect CMS platform, leveraging multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap Switch, and others for UI and functionality. It uses external CDNs for fonts, scripts, and stylesheets, which aids in performance but also introduces dependency risks. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a major technical and security deficiency. Performance metrics indicate a slow load time (~13.8 seconds) and a large page size (~491 KB), suggesting room for optimization. The site includes cookie consent management via Axeptio and analytics tracking with Google Analytics and RudderStack, respecting user consent. No JSON-LD structured data was detected, which could be improved for SEO. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leclubdesclubsimmobiliers.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leclubdesclubsimmobiliers.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.