Skip to main content

Security report for leadboosterpro.io

Lead Booster Pro · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lead Booster Pro is a SaaS company specializing in lead generation and funnel building tools designed to double conversion rates for businesses without increasing ad spend. The platform offers a multi-path form builder, analytics, and integrations to optimize lead capture and conversion. Positioned as an alternative to Typeform, it targets businesses seeking smarter, conversion-optimized funnels. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and optimized for SEO and mobile use. It employs modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Ads and Plausible Analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-branded, suitable for a small technology startup launched in 2024.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadboosterpro.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on marketing technology and lead generation. Its business model is SaaS subscription-based, offering funnel building and lead capture solutions. The target audience includes marketing teams and businesses aiming to improve lead conversion rates. Testimonials and a 4.9-star rating indicate positive customer reception. The domain is newly registered in 2024 with privacy protection, consistent with a startup profile. The company leverages integrations with CRM and marketing tools to streamline lead management. No direct contact information or detailed corporate data is publicly available, which is typical for early-stage SaaS companies. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Ads and Plausible Analytics, indicating a data-driven approach to customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. Cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lead Booster Pro
Description
Convert more website visitors into qualified leads with multi-path forms that adapt to different buying stages. Try free.
Key services
Funnel builder, Form design, Analytics, Integrations, Lead capture forms, Conversion optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Borlabs Cookie
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Privacy Protect WHOIS
  • Cookie consent mechanism via Borlabs Cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Analytics via GTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-16494135409)
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed SaaS platform for lead generation and funnel building.
  2. Content is rich with detailed product features, testimonials, and use cases.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or header/footer.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided content.
  6. Uses modern WordPress stack with Elementor and Yoast SEO for optimization.
  7. Includes Google Ads and Plausible Analytics for marketing and tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. Domain is new but consistent with startup business age and model.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking and marketing. The hosting provider is identified via nameservers as fcomet.com. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and caching plugins (WP Rocket) in use. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive images. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is appropriate for a SaaS marketing website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadboosterpro.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadboosterpro.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.