Skip to main content

Security report for leadberry.com

Brandlift, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadberry is a technology company offering a web-based B2B lead generation software that converts website visitors into sales leads by leveraging Google Analytics data. The company targets sales, marketing teams, management, and agencies globally, positioning itself as a reliable SaaS provider with a strong market presence evidenced by testimonials and media features. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize lead generation and user engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and CAPTCHA protections, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional presentation and parent company association. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadberry.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadberry operates in the competitive B2B lead generation market with a SaaS subscription model, offering features such as company identification, visitor analytics, enriched contact data, and CRM integrations. Its clientele ranges from startups to Fortune 500 companies, indicating broad market appeal. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem and uses extensive third-party marketing and tracking tools to drive growth. The parent company Brandlift provides corporate backing. The business model focuses on ease of use, quick sign-up, and integration capabilities, which are key competitive advantages. The website content and testimonials reinforce credibility and customer satisfaction, supporting sustainable growth and market positioning.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and publishing vulnerability disclosure information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brandlift, Inc.
Description
Leadberry is a web based B2B lead generation software that converts website visitors to sales leads. Powered by Google Analytics.
Key services
B2B lead identification, Company visitor analytics, Contact and social data enrichment, Custom reports and alerts, CRM integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, Google Analytics, YouTube iframe API, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Quora Pixel, AdRoll, Hotjar, Drip, Swiper.js, jQuery
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Drip
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Quora Pixel, Hotjar, Drip
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, LinkedIn Insight, Drip
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  3. Clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies present
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Multiple forms collect email addresses with consent checkboxes
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry issues
  8. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security warnings
  9. Good mobile responsiveness and user experience
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS framework with integration of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and Drip. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components and jQuery for DOM manipulation. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security reviews. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable SaaS offering.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadberry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadberry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.