Skip to main content

Security report for lcvrealestate.be

LCV Real Estate · Real Estate · Belgium

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LCV Real Estate is a Belgian project developer specializing in commercial real estate, offering a broad portfolio of projects including KMO units, retail, logistics, and build-to-suit developments primarily in Belgium and neighboring countries. The company targets businesses seeking to purchase or rent commercial properties, positioning itself as an expert partner for real estate investments with added value. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides comprehensive project information and contact options. Technically, the site uses modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads, integrated via Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but lacks some security headers and published incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration restrictions, which lowers domain trustworthiness despite the professional web presence. Overall, the site scores well on content and privacy compliance but should improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lcvrealestate.be

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LCV Real Estate operates in the real estate development sector focusing on commercial properties. Their business model revolves around developing, selling, and renting commercial real estate projects, including KMO units, retail spaces, logistics centers, and custom build-to-suit solutions. The company has a medium-sized market presence primarily in Belgium with projects also in France, the Netherlands, and Denmark. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise and comprehensive project portfolio, supported by a professional online presence and active social media channels. The website indicates a structured approach to project marketing and client engagement, including detailed filtering options and contact forms with privacy compliance. Partnerships with marketing and analytics providers enhance their digital marketing capabilities. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a risk factor but does not currently impact their operational credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with mandatory privacy consent, reflecting good baseline security practices. It integrates multiple tracking and advertising scripts, which increases the attack surface but appears managed. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data is restricted, which may raise concerns about domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Review domain registration details and consider improving WHOIS transparency to increase trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LCV Real Estate
VAT number
BE 0430 969 416
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LCV Real Estate
Description
LCV Real Estate is a project developer specializing in commercial real estate, offering locations for companies to establish or expand their business with expertise in creating added value for investments.
Key services
Development of KMO units, Retail spaces, Build to suit projects, Logistics and showroom spaces, Sales and rental of commercial real estate
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Google Maps API, Plyr.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form with required privacy consent checkbox
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Dutch language
  2. Comprehensive project listings with geographic and status filters
  3. Clear contact form with privacy consent
  4. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. Use of multiple analytics and advertising tracking services
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable or blocked, reducing domain trustworthiness
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Tag Manager orchestrating analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads. It leverages Google Maps API for location services and Plyr.js for media playback. The site is built with responsive design principles and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing but no suspicious domains were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence but could benefit from improved security configurations and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lcvrealestate.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lcvrealestate.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.