Skip to main content

Security report for lbd.fr

La Brosse & Dupont · Retail · France

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

La Brosse & Dupont is a well-established French company founded in 1998, specializing in the conception, manufacturing, and distribution of daily consumer products sold primarily through large and medium retail outlets. The company holds a strong market position in the retail and manufacturing sectors, emphasizing innovation and sustainability, as evidenced by its PME+ certification and commitment to corporate social responsibility (RSE). Their key services include product design, logistics, and in-store sales force support, targeting retail partners and end consumers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, and cookie consent management via Axeptio. The site is hosted by OVH, a reputable provider, and demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Embedded multimedia content and social media integrations enhance user engagement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, alongside cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with strong business credibility and compliance with privacy regulations. Strategic enhancements in security policy transparency and technical security headers would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lbd.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

La Brosse & Dupont operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, focusing on consumer daily-use products. The company benefits from a long operational history since 1998 and holds the PME+ label, highlighting its leadership in responsible business practices. Its business model integrates product innovation, logistics, and sales force services, targeting large and medium retail chains. The company maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and detailed product universes. Partnerships and certifications reinforce its market credibility. The website supports growth through digital engagement and transparent communication of corporate values and sustainability efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is actively managed, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely communication in case of security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
La Brosse & Dupont
Description
La Brosse & Dupont est une entreprise française qui conçoit, fabrique et distribue des produits du quotidien, toujours plus innovants, vendus en grandes et moyennes surfaces.
Key services
Product conception, Manufacturing, Distribution, Logistics, Sales force in stores
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slick Slider, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, Axeptio (cookie consent), AddToAny (social sharing), Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
YouTube (embedded videos)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on corporate social responsibility (RSE) and sustainability.
  3. Comprehensive product and company information available.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  7. No phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  8. Contact primarily via email and contact forms.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Slider, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo Analytics. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and images. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools is balanced with user consent mechanisms. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking, representing a modernization opportunity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lbd.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lbd.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.