Skip to main content

Security report for laxasv.se

Laxå Special Vehicles AB · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laxå Special Vehicles AB is a specialized manufacturer and developer of custom special vehicles, with a strong legacy dating back to 1968. The company focuses on producing and customizing vehicle cabins and chassis, particularly CrewCab models, tailored to customer specifications. Their close collaboration with Scania positions them as a trusted niche player in the transportation sector in Sweden. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting customers requiring specialized vehicle solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for marketing and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers and explicit security policies indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR adherence information. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding cookie consent. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. The website provides clear contact information and social media presence, reinforcing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laxasv.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Laxå Special Vehicles operates in the transportation manufacturing sector, specializing in custom vehicle chassis and cabins. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing expertise and partnership with Scania, enabling them to deliver tailored solutions to demanding customers. The business model centers on manufacturing and customization services, targeting logistics and transportation companies needing specialized vehicles. The company appears small-sized but well-established with a focused market niche. Growth indicators include ongoing product development and a clear recruitment call. The partnership ecosystem includes Scania and social media channels for outreach. Strategic observations suggest maintaining strong OEM partnerships and enhancing digital presence for broader market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies reveal gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. GDPR compliance is partial, with no cookie consent banners detected. The business impact of these gaps is moderate, primarily affecting user trust and regulatory compliance. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented, which could delay handling of security events. Overall, the security culture appears basic but can be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Laxå Special Vehicles AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Laxå Special Vehicles AB
Description
Utveckling och tillverkning av specialfordon sedan 1968. Idag bygger vi den nya generationen CrewCab och specialanpassar hytter och chassier helt efter kundens önskemål.
Key services
Development and manufacturing of special vehicles, Customization of cabins (CrewCab) and chassis, Special adaptations per customer requirements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 4.0.0-beta, Conditionizr 4.3.0, Modernizr 2.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics and SDK scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented in Swedish language
  3. No visible forms collecting user data on homepage
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical addresses
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4 and jQuery 3.2.1, with additional libraries like Conditionizr and Modernizr for feature detection. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK. The site uses responsive design techniques and loads resources asynchronously to optimize performance. However, no advanced hosting or CDN details were detected. The site performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing scripts and images. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include updating to newer library versions and implementing progressive web app features. The current technical risks are minimal but could increase without proactive maintenance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laxasv.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laxasv.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.