Skip to main content

Security report for lavenelle-montreuil.org

La Venelle · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

La Venelle is a non-profit community organization based in Montreuil, France, focused on promoting solidarity-based reuse and circular economy practices. It hosts nine associations that operate reuse shops, repair workshops, and social insertion employment programs. The organization also offers a café-cantine and hosts cultural events, positioning itself as a local hub for ecological and social initiatives. The website reflects this mission with clear content, community-oriented messaging, and accessible navigation. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Ionic and React, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, it lacks explicit privacy and security policies, and no security headers or vulnerability disclosures are present. The site does not use tracking or analytics scripts, aligning with its privacy-conscious stance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lavenelle-montreuil.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

La Venelle occupies a niche in the non-profit sector focused on reuse and social economy, leveraging partnerships with multiple associations to deliver a comprehensive reuse village experience. Its business model centers on social insertion and ecological impact rather than profit, targeting environmentally conscious citizens and local communities. The organization benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem, including regional reuse networks. Growth potential lies in expanding community engagement and digital presence. The website supports this by providing event programming and workshop registrations, though it lacks detailed business metrics or financial transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or explicit security policies. No forms appear to collect sensitive data beyond a newsletter email input, which lacks visible security assurances. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicates gaps in compliance and incident response readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site’s minimal tracking and absence of third-party analytics reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Ensure all forms, especially newsletter sign-ups, use secure transmission and provide user assurances about data handling.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding ARIA attributes and improving meta descriptions and keywords.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
La Venelle
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
La Venelle
Description
La Venelle is a non-profit village dedicated to solidarity-based reuse (réemploi solidaire) located in Montreuil, France. It hosts 9 associations specializing in reuse and circular economy, offering second-hand goods, repair workshops, and social insertion employment. The site promotes ecological and social objectives by providing a space for reuse, repair, and community activities including a café-cantine and various events.
Key services
Reuse shops, Repair and upcycling workshops, Social insertion employment, Café-cantine, Events and cultural programming
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Ionic Framework, React (implied by react-helmet usage), Google Fonts, TinyMCE (rich text editor), Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Ionic, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No cookies or trackers requiring consent
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service policies found.
  3. Cookie consent banner states no cookies or trackers requiring consent.
  4. Contact information is available via contact form and social media links; no direct email or phone found.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies including Ionic and React.
  6. Content is focused on social and ecological reuse, with community engagement.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Branding is consistent but could be improved with clearer logos and metadata.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Ionic Framework and React, with integration of Google Fonts and TinyMCE for rich text editing. It uses a custom or proprietary CMS or static site generator, with assets served via a CDN (tinifycdn.com). The site is mobile optimized and uses a slick carousel for content display. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and SEO metadata completeness. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests a privacy-first approach but limits data-driven optimization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lavenelle-montreuil.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lavenelle-montreuil.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.