Latgales Piens is a regional dairy product manufacturer based in Latvia, operating as part of the AS Preiļu siers group. The company specializes in producing a full range of whole milk products including milk, kefir, cream, butter, cheeses, and desserts, targeting consumers primarily in the Latgale region. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a clear market position as the sole full assortment whole milk producer in Latgale. The digital presence is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern but standard e-commerce infrastructure. The site is well-structured, mobile optimized, and includes social media integration, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. However, the absence of privacy and terms of service pages indicates gaps in compliance documentation.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55
After the cap
49
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention latgalespiens.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for latgalespiens.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company benefits from its affiliation with the AS Preiļu siers concern, which provides a strong regional network including subsidiaries and partners such as AS Krāslavas piens and SIA Vietējā. This ecosystem supports diversified dairy product offerings and regional distribution. The business model focuses on manufacturing and retail, with a clear emphasis on quality and regional identity. The website content and linked domains suggest a stable partnership ecosystem and a focus on local market penetration. Growth indicators include active marketing via social media and regular news updates. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales through retail and possibly wholesale channels.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, demonstrating basic security and privacy awareness. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages represents a compliance risk, especially under GDPR. No forms or input fields were found, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The use of common CMS and plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Recommendations
Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and company responsibilities.
Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Conduct regular security audits and update third-party plugins and libraries to minimize vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Latgales Piens
Description
AS “Latgales piens” is part of AS “Preiļu siers” concern and is the only full assortment whole milk product manufacturer in the Latgale region.
Key services
Production of milk, Production of kefir, Production of cream, Production of butter, Production of various dairy desserts and cheeses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, WooCommerce, Elementor, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No visible exposed sensitive data
Cookie consent banner implemented
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured navigation.
No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and WooCommerce plugins.
Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked and active.
Contact information is clearly presented in footer with phone, email, and physical address.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for product management, indicating a standard e-commerce setup. The inclusion of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager shows integration of external resources for design and analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site structure is clear with well-defined navigation menus and product categorization. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The technical stack is modern but relies on common open-source components that require vigilant maintenance to avoid security risks.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with latgalespiens.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latgalespiens.lv.