Skip to main content

Security report for latamcargo.com

LATAM Cargo · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LATAM Cargo operates as a major air cargo service provider primarily serving Latin America with international and domestic freight transportation solutions. The website offers comprehensive information about shipment preparation, product portfolios, e-services such as tracking and booking, and customer support, targeting businesses and individuals requiring air freight logistics. The digital infrastructure employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some security headers implemented, though improvements in Content Security Policy and incident response transparency are recommended. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy but does not detract from the professional presentation and branding consistent with LATAM Airlines Group. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latamcargo.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention latamcargo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
428
Employees
0
Customers
428
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
23%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for latamcargo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LATAM Cargo holds a strong market position as a leading air cargo carrier in Latin America, leveraging the LATAM Airlines Group brand. Its business model focuses on air freight transportation, supported by a suite of digital services to streamline shipment management. The company targets a broad audience including commercial shippers and individual customers. The website reflects a large enterprise with extensive service offerings and partnerships, including carbon offset initiatives and customer support via Zendesk. The digital presence supports LATAM Cargo's logistics operations but lacks some transparency in privacy and security policies. Growth indicators include integration of e-services and rewards programs, positioning LATAM Cargo competitively in the air freight logistics sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a Content Security Policy header restricting connections to trusted analytics and tag manager domains, enhancing protection against common web threats. However, commented out CSP directives suggest potential past use of unsafe inline scripts, which should be fully eliminated. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, and no incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which is not fully balanced by privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by adopting stricter CSP, publishing security policies, and enhancing user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive and strict Content Security Policy disallowing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' scripts.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LATAM Cargo
Description
LATAM Cargo is an air cargo service provider offering international and domestic air freight transportation, shipment preparation, e-services including tracking, booking, and quotations, and customer support.
Key services
Air freight transportation, Shipment preparation and packaging recommendations, E-Tracking, E-Booking, E-AWB, Quotations, Cargo Rewards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, Bootstrap 4.5.3, jQuery 3.6.0, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Select2, DataTables, CryptoJS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. Security headers partially implemented; CSP is restrictive but some unsafe directives commented out.
  6. No visible forms in provided HTML snippet; login link points to external subdomain.
  7. Branding consistent with LATAM Cargo air freight services.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4.5.3 for responsive design, jQuery 3.6.0 and jQuery UI for UI components, Select2 for enhanced select boxes, DataTables for tabular data, and CryptoJS for cryptographic functions. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized with a viewport meta tag and responsive navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS is detected from the HTML. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. The site lacks some SEO and accessibility enhancements but maintains a professional and consistent design. Technical risks include potential outdated libraries and lack of advanced security headers beyond CSP.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latamcargo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latamcargo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.