Skip to main content

Security report for lasterikkad.ee

Eesti Lasterikaste Perede Liit · Non-profit · Estonia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Lasterikaste Perede Liit is a reputable Estonian non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for large families with three or more children. The organization operates a well-structured website built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, providing information about their activities, events, and support services. The site demonstrates a solid digital presence with modern technologies and SEO optimization, targeting families and member organizations in Estonia. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers and policies could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a notable gap for GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, serving its community effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lasterikkad.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong position in the Estonian non-profit sector focused on family welfare. It maintains a network of 20 member organizations and supports nearly 3900 families, indicating significant reach and influence. Their business model revolves around advocacy, community events, and public awareness campaigns. The website content and structured data reflect transparency and engagement with stakeholders. Partnerships with government entities and public reporting enhance credibility. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and event sponsorships. The organization targets large families and related stakeholders, positioning itself as a key advocate in Estonia.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt file is present for vulnerability disclosure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but can be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers for support and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Lasterikaste Perede Liit
Description
Eesti Lasterikaste Perede Liit is a non-profit organization advocating for the interests of large families in Estonia. It supports families with three or more children, aiming to improve their security and quality of life through advocacy, cooperation, and public awareness.
Key services
Advocacy for large families, Organizing training and events, Public attitude shaping, Network cooperation, Providing Perekaart benefits
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.1.9, WooCommerce 7.1.0, jQuery 3.6.1, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established non-profit advocacy platform for large families in Estonia.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and professionally presented.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found, indicating a compliance gap.
  4. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  8. Social media links not explicitly found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Analytics for enhanced user experience and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices via Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations, offering ease of content management and scalability. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security enhancements and privacy compliance updates are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lasterikkad.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lasterikkad.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.