Skip to main content

Security report for lastekaitseliit.ee

MTÜ Lastekaitse Liit · Non-profit · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MTÜ Lastekaitse Liit is a well-established Estonian non-profit organization dedicated to the protection of children's rights and interests. The organization actively develops and implements child protection projects, provides expert opinions on child protection legislation, supports child and youth participation, organizes training for professionals, and offers camp services and scholarships for children and youth. The website reflects a clear mission and target audience focused on children, families, and child welfare professionals. Technically, the site is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce integration, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery, and Slider Revolution, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube channels linked. Overall, the website demonstrates good professionalism and trustworthiness but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security policy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lastekaitseliit.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on child protection and advocacy in Estonia. It maintains partnerships with several related initiatives and government bodies, including social ministry support. The business model is centered on advocacy, education, and community support programs, with revenue likely from grants, donations, and government funding. The website's e-commerce component suggests some merchandise or donation facilitation. The presence of multiple partner domains and program sites indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The organization's market position is stable within its niche, supported by clear branding and consistent messaging. Growth indicators include active program promotion and digital engagement through social media and online resources.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses security plugins such as Wordfence, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML content. Forms are implemented using Contact Form 7, a widely used and secure plugin. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure statements limits transparency and preparedness perception. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. Security headers are not explicitly identified, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing and publishing security and privacy policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and a security policy page to increase transparency and user trust.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and broaden audience reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MTÜ Lastekaitse Liit
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTÜ Lastekaitse Liit
Description
Lastekaitse Liit is a non-profit organization operating in the public interest to protect children's rights and interests, develop child protection activities, participate in the development and implementation of child and family policies, and represent the common interests of its members.
Key services
Development and implementation of child protection projects and programs, Providing opinions on child protection legislation, Supporting child and youth participation, Organizing training for professionals working with children, Providing camp services for children and youth, Awarding scholarships to children and youth
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, WooCommerce 9.9.4, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Kadence Theme, jQuery, Lightbox PhotoSwipe, Contact Form 7, AYS Popup Box
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Wordfence detected by script)
  • Secure forms (Contact Form 7)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with alternate language versions available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes a valid email and physical address in Tallinn, Estonia.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube is established.
  6. The site uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security plugins but lacks published security policies.
  8. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found.
  9. Multiple external partner domains linked, indicating collaboration.
  10. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with WooCommerce 9.9.4, using a modern Kadence theme and popular plugins like Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. It uses jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for interactivity. The site loads Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, but there is potential to optimize loading speed and enhance accessibility compliance. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lastekaitseliit.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lastekaitseliit.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.