Skip to main content

Security report for landrover.no

Land Rover Norge · Transportation · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Land Rover Norge operates as the official Norwegian portal for the Land Rover brand, focusing on luxury SUVs and four-wheel drive vehicles such as Range Rover, Discovery, and Defender. The website targets Norwegian consumers interested in premium automotive products, providing brand information and vehicle exploration services. The site is part of the larger Jaguar Land Rover group, reflecting a strong market position in the luxury transportation sector in Norway. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically Nuxt.js, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with good performance and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, with no signs of suspicious activity or content safety concerns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landrover.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the premium automotive retail sector, representing a globally recognized luxury brand. Its business model centers on vehicle sales and brand experience, targeting affluent consumers in Norway. The website supports a multi-language global strategy, indicated by numerous hreflang tags. The company benefits from strong brand recognition and a parent company with significant market presence. While direct contact details are limited on the site, structured data indicates localized service and language support. The absence of explicit privacy and terms pages suggests areas for compliance improvement. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot, supporting data-driven insights and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder transparency and responsiveness in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security headers to improve its security maturity and compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Land Rover Norge
Description
Tre inn i en verden av de mest attraktive luksus-SUV-ene. Utforsk Range Rover, Discovery og Defender.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Vehicle exploration and configuration, Brand information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage), Nuxt.js, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for Land Rover Norway
  2. Content is primarily in Norwegian targeting local consumers
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  5. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking
  6. No obvious security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  8. Structured data includes organization and contactPoint with language and area served
  9. Multiple hreflang alternate links indicate a global multi-language strategy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. It uses CDN-hosted fonts and images from Jaguar Land Rover's media servers, ensuring performance optimization. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie management, supporting regulatory compliance and marketing needs. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of explicit CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, but further optimization could be explored. The technical infrastructure aligns well with a premium brand's digital presence but could improve in security header implementation and explicit compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landrover.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landrover.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.