Skip to main content

Security report for landrover.lv

Land Rover Latvija · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Land Rover Latvija operates as the official representation of the Land Rover luxury automotive brand in Latvia, focusing on the sales and promotion of luxury SUVs and 4x4 vehicles such as Range Rover, Discovery, and Defender. The website serves as a digital showroom and information portal targeting general consumers interested in premium automotive products. The company positions itself strongly in the luxury transportation sector within the Latvian market, leveraging the global Land Rover brand recognition. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses consent management tools, but lacks explicit security headers and visible security policies such as privacy or cookie policies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a legitimate and transparent domain registration. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen the company's digital security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landrover.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Land Rover Latvija holds a significant position in the luxury automotive retail sector in Latvia, capitalizing on the strong global Land Rover brand. The business model revolves around direct consumer engagement through vehicle sales and brand experience. The target audience includes affluent individuals and automotive enthusiasts seeking premium SUVs and off-road vehicles. The company benefits from a well-established partnership ecosystem with Jaguar Land Rover and related service providers. Growth indicators include a comprehensive digital presence and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may pose compliance risks in evolving regulatory environments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of consent management platforms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by consent mechanisms but lacks comprehensive documentation. Enhancing security headers, publishing clear policies, and establishing incident response contacts would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Land Rover Latvija
Description
Ienāciet visiekārojamāko luksusa SUV pasaulē. Atklājiet Range Rover, Discovery un Defender
Key services
luxury SUV sales, 4x4 vehicle sales, brand information and promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics (consent management), Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • Consent management script included

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Google Ads
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for Land Rover in Latvia.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but consent management is implemented.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks (Nuxt.js, Vue.js).
  5. Includes Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is properly configured.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a Vue.js framework, indicating a modern and modular front-end architecture. It leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, reflecting a mature approach to user tracking and privacy compliance. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and media assets are served via Jaguar Land Rover's CDN, suggesting a distributed content delivery strategy. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical assets and asynchronous script loading. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom or proprietary content management solution. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance, as well as to implement additional security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landrover.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landrover.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.