Skip to main content

Security report for landrover.ee

Land Rover Eesti · Transportation · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Land Rover Eesti operates as the official regional website for the Land Rover brand in Estonia, focusing on luxury SUVs and 4x4 vehicles such as Range Rover, Discovery, and Defender. The site targets affluent customers interested in premium automotive products, providing detailed vehicle information and brand experience. The business is positioned as a key player in the transportation sector within Estonia, backed by the global Jaguar Land Rover parent company. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js/Vue.js), CDN delivery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and visible privacy or terms of service documentation, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-branded, with moderate tracking and analytics usage. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, and adding clear contact information for incident response to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landrover.ee

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital touchpoint for Land Rover's luxury automotive offerings in Estonia, catering to a niche market of premium vehicle buyers. Its business model revolves around brand representation, customer engagement, and facilitating sales through dealer locators and product information. The presence of multiple language alternate links reflects a global brand strategy with localized content. The site benefits from strong brand equity and a consistent marketing ecosystem supported by Jaguar Land Rover. While direct revenue streams are not visible, the site supports sales and after-sales services. The partnership ecosystem includes global Jaguar Land Rover domains, indicating integrated brand management. Growth indicators include modern web technologies and consent management, aligning with regulatory requirements and customer expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and integration of consent management tools like Usercentrics. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of visible privacy policies and incident response contacts suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics, which require careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but would benefit from enhanced header policies and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize data leakage.
  5. Develop a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Land Rover Eesti
Description
Sisenege kõige ihaldusväärsemate luksusmaasturite maailma. Tutvuge Range Roveri, Discovery ja Defenderiga.
Key services
Vehicle information, Model exploration, Dealer locator, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework), Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics (consent management), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification present
  • Consent management script included

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official regional site for Land Rover in Estonia.
  2. Content is professionally presented with consistent branding.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Consent management is implemented via Usercentrics.
  5. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  8. Multiple alternate language links indicate a global brand presence.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework), served via Jaguar Land Rover's CDN infrastructure. It uses Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management, indicating a focus on regulatory compliance and data-driven marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloads critical fonts and images for performance. However, no CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and caching strategies. Accessibility features are basic, with room for enhancement to meet WCAG standards. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, aiding search engine visibility and social sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landrover.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landrover.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.