Skip to main content

Security report for landrover.dk

Land Rover Danmark · Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Land Rover Danmark operates as the official Danish website for the Land Rover brand, showcasing luxury SUVs such as Range Rover, Defender, and Discovery. The site targets consumers in Denmark interested in premium automotive products, providing detailed model information and brand experience. The website is built on modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, ensuring a responsive and visually appealing user experience. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, indicates areas for compliance and user trust improvement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers and incident response contacts are not evident. Overall, the domain appears legitimate and consistent with a large automotive brand, though WHOIS data is unavailable for further verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landrover.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Land Rover as a premium automotive brand in the Danish market, focusing on luxury SUVs. The business model revolves around brand representation and vehicle sales facilitation through local dealers. The site is part of a global network of Land Rover localized domains, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy documentation may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The site’s technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN resources, supporting scalability and performance. Growth indicators include extensive localization and multi-language support across related domains. Strategic observations suggest enhancing transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, which could hinder timely security communication. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the business to GDPR risks. The site does not appear to use tracking or advertising scripts that could introduce privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by including terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Land Rover Danmark
Description
Velkommen til Land Rover Danmark. Oplev vores luksus SUV'er; Range Rover, Defender og Discovery.
Key services
Showcasing Land Rover vehicle models, Providing vehicle information and specifications, Dealer locator and contact facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Fonts, Custom fonts, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of preconnect and preload for performance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a localized official brand site for Land Rover in Denmark.
  2. Content is professionally presented with good branding consistency.
  3. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details.
  4. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No security headers information available from provided data.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts explicitly identified.
  9. Site uses modern web technologies (Nuxt.js, Vue.js).
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, leveraging CDN-hosted fonts and images for performance optimization. Preconnect and preload directives are used to improve resource loading times. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and accessible font sizes. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data for organization and website. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the provided data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through enhanced caching and security header implementation. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a premium brand website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landrover.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landrover.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.