Skip to main content

Security report for landia.cz

Landia Management s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Landia Management s.r.o. is a Czech engineering and investment company specializing in residential, development, and leisure real estate projects primarily in Prague. The company targets investors and residents interested in quality living spaces and community-oriented developments. Their portfolio includes cooperative housing, senior care homes, and sports and leisure facilities. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, supporting their market position as a reputable local developer. Technically, the website uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.11.0, Fancybox, and Slick Carousel. While functional and moderately optimized for mobile, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of visible security headers indicate areas for improvement. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and uses Google Analytics for tracking, reflecting moderate digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit privacy policies and terms of service, and no WHOIS data is available for the domain, which reduces trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but security headers and modern best practices should be implemented to enhance protection. The cookie consent banner and contact transparency are positive indicators. Overall, the website presents a credible business with good professionalism and user experience but requires improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landia.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention landia.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for landia.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Landia Management operates in the real estate sector with a focus on residential and community development projects in Prague. Their competitive advantage lies in their engineering expertise and investment approach, emphasizing quality living environments and community values. The business model centers on property development and investment, targeting local investors and residents. The company maintains an active online presence with project showcases and news updates, supporting growth and customer engagement. Partnerships with architectural and urban planning firms are evident, enhancing project quality. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but does not currently impact operational credibility. The company appears medium-sized with a stable market position in the Czech real estate market.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website uses HTTPS (assumed from standard practice, though SSL details are not provided), includes a cookie consent banner, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.0) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  4. Establish a security.txt file and a clear vulnerability disclosure process to enhance incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Landia Management s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Landia Management s.r.o.
Description
Landia Management s.r.o. is a purely Czech engineering and investment company focused on residential, development, and leisure projects in Prague.
Key services
Residential development, Development of cooperative housing, Senior care housing, Sports and leisure area development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery Fancybox, Slick Carousel, Custom JavaScript (lucid.js, init.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with explicit consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about real estate projects.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
  7. Uses Google Analytics for tracking with consent.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  10. Website uses older jQuery version (1.11.0), which may have security implications.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using classic web technologies including jQuery 1.11.0, Fancybox, and Slick Carousel for UI components. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and description, supporting basic SEO. The site is mobile responsive with a cookie consent mechanism implemented. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. The use of older JavaScript libraries suggests some technical debt. No CMS or modern frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO could be improved with richer metadata and structured data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.