Skip to main content

Security report for landhub.com

LandHub · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LandHub is an established online real estate marketplace specializing in land, ranches, farms, and acreage properties primarily in the United States, with some international listings. Founded in 2005, it offers a platform for buyers and sellers to connect, featuring property listings with detailed filters and multimedia content. The company leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted behind Cloudflare, to deliver its services. However, the website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, which critically impacts its security posture and user trust. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with no advanced consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators. Social media presence is strong, supporting marketing and customer engagement efforts. Overall, the business appears legitimate and mature, but the technical and security implementations require significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of landhub.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landhub.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LandHub occupies a niche market in rural and land real estate, targeting buyers and sellers interested in acreage, farms, and ranches. Its business model centers on providing a digital marketplace with free buyer profiles and seller services, supported by targeted advertising and social media marketing. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus and extensive property listings. Revenue likely derives from seller services and advertising. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, appealing to a medium-sized audience in the real estate sector. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth indicators include recent property listings and active social media channels.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While Cloudflare provides CDN and some security headers, critical protections such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, which could improve domain integrity. The presence of SPF and DMARC records for email protection is positive. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the site requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security policies to protect users and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and some security benefits. However, performance data is missing, suggesting potential issues with load times or monitoring. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is adequately addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Technical debt is evident in the lack of SSL and incomplete security headers. Modernization opportunities include improving security configurations and adding analytics and monitoring tools for better performance insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 −6Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 68/100 +1Medium27 findingsView report
  3. 67/100 +9Medium28 findingsView report
  4. 58/100 −10Medium24 findingsView report
  5. 68/100 +1Medium27 findingsView report
  6. 67/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landhub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landhub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.