Skip to main content

Security report for landflight.co.uk

LandFlight Travel Services · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LandFlight Travel Services operates a UK-based transportation business specializing in bus, coach, chauffeur, and airport transfer services. The company targets corporate and private clients, emphasizing eco-friendly and executive vehicle options. The website is professionally designed, built on WordPress, and incorporates modern technologies such as Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. Despite a generally good security posture with HTTPS and secure forms, the site lacks some security headers and has a broken Google Maps integration. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rule violations, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and contact information appear credible and consistent with a legitimate business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landflight.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a regional transportation service provider with a focus on sustainable and executive transport solutions. Its business model revolves around service provision for events, corporate clients, and airport transfers. The website content and social media presence support a small-sized business with a clear market niche. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration irregularities may indicate a need for better domain management or privacy considerations. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and service descriptions, supporting trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect user interactions, indicating a moderate security maturity level. However, the absence of key security headers and the exposure of a Google Maps API key with errors suggest areas for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact compliance with regulations such as GDPR or NIS2. The site does not display cookie consent banners despite tracking usage, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Resolve Google Maps API key issues and restrict API key usage to authorized domains.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  5. Review domain registration details and correct WHOIS inconsistencies to enhance trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LandFlight Travel Services
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LandFlight Travel Services
Description
LandFlight provides bus, coach, chauffeur drive, and airport transfer services primarily in the UK, operating a fleet including electric and executive vehicles.
Key services
Bus Services, Coach Services, Chauffeur Drive, Airport Transfers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.11, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, FontAwesome, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  3. Google Maps integration is broken due to API key or configuration issues.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked in footer.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking and reCAPTCHA.
  7. Website built on WordPress with common plugins and SEO optimizations.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter is linked.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  10. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.11 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Yoast SEO, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. It uses jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for functionality and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with some technical debt indicated by outdated WordPress version and broken Google Maps integration. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landflight.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landflight.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.