Skip to main content

Security report for lamborghini.com

Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. · Transportation · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. is a globally recognized luxury automotive manufacturer specializing in high-performance sports cars and supercars. The company operates a professional and well-branded website targeting luxury car buyers and automotive enthusiasts worldwide. The site offers comprehensive information about Lamborghini's models, news, events, and dealer networks, reflecting its premium market position under the Volkswagen Group umbrella. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, integrates advanced monitoring via New Relic, and employs Google Tag Manager for analytics, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements robust security headers, and uses a compliant cookie consent mechanism, although it lacks a public security policy or incident response contact. Overall, the website presents a secure, professional, and user-friendly digital presence aligned with Lamborghini's brand prestige.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of lamborghini.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lamborghini.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
90
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lamborghini.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,240
Employees
1
Customers
1,142
Third parties
97
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2025-07-28 · 28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lamborghini.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –lambo-hub-qa.lamborghini.com2025-07-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lamborghini maintains a strong market position as a luxury sports car manufacturer with a clear focus on exclusivity and performance. The business model centers on manufacturing and selling premium vehicles supported by a global dealer network and after-sales services. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on affluent customers and automotive enthusiasts, with extensive use of multimedia and event promotion to engage its audience. The integration of advanced analytics and consent management tools reflects a commitment to data-driven marketing and regulatory compliance. While the WHOIS data is unavailable, the brand's established reputation and consistent digital presence mitigate concerns. Strategic partnerships and parent company affiliation with Volkswagen Group further strengthen its market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent and New Relic for monitoring indicates adherence to privacy and performance best practices. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents areas for improvement. No vulnerable libraries or suspicious scripts were detected. The overall security score is high, but enhancing transparency around security practices would further bolster trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and emerging regulations like NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security measures and compliance commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards, improving inclusivity and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
VAT number
IT 00799950369
Registration number
REA BO-123456
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
Description
Offizielle Webseite von Lamborghini: alle von Lamborghini verkauften Modelle online, Neuzugänge, aktuelle Nachrichten, Events und Händler auf der Welt
Key services
Luxury sports car sales, After-sales services, Events and news dissemination, Dealer network support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, New Relic monitoring, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust cookie consent
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags in content or scripts
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not uncommon for major brands
  6. No public security policy or incident response contact found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present
  8. Social media presence is well integrated
  9. No suspicious external domains detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and responsive design. Integration with New Relic and Google Tag Manager supports robust monitoring and analytics capabilities. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent management, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. The technical implementation shows attention to SEO, accessibility, and user experience, with no broken elements detected. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but performance metrics suggest a high-quality hosting environment. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation around security and incident response to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lamborghini.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lamborghini.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.