Skip to main content

Security report for labiblia.org

Sociedad Biblica Iberoamericana · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Sociedad Biblica Iberoamericana operates as a non-profit organization focused on the dissemination and study of the Bible, particularly through its Biblia Textual editions and related educational resources. The website serves a Spanish-speaking audience interested in biblical textual studies, offering courses, audio, video, and articles to support religious education. The organization has a clear market niche in religious education and textual biblical scholarship, with a history dating back to 1998 and physical presence in the US and Spain. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies, is mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with no critical security or content safety issues detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching labiblia.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a specialized non-profit in the religious education sector, leveraging digital platforms to distribute its Biblia Textual editions and educational content. Its business model relies on providing free and paid resources to a targeted audience of biblical scholars, students, and religious communities. The presence of multiple physical offices and a long-established domain supports its credibility. The website's external links to apps and online reading platforms indicate a strategy to expand digital reach. However, the absence of terms of service and explicit security policies suggests areas for organizational maturity improvement. The lack of advertising and tracking reflects a privacy-conscious approach aligned with non-profit values.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The cookie consent mechanism is GDPR compliant, enhancing privacy protections. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit educational site but could be strengthened with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sociedad Biblica Iberoamericana
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sociedad Biblica Iberoamericana
Description
La Sociedad Bíblica Iberoamericana se dedica a la difusión y estudio de la Biblia, ofreciendo recursos como la Biblia Textual, materiales educativos, audios, videos, artículos y cursos relacionados con el texto sagrado.
Key services
Biblia Textual editions, Educational courses, Audio and video materials, Articles and publications, Online reading and mobile app
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Web fonts (Raleway), Responsive design
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish with some Portuguese resources.
  3. Focus on biblical textual studies and educational materials.
  4. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple physical addresses and phone numbers.
  5. No explicit privacy or security certifications found on site.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with custom fonts and responsive design techniques. The CMS or platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is with Network Solutions, LLC. There is no evidence of heavy analytics or tracking scripts, which aligns with privacy considerations. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with labiblia.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review labiblia.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.