Skip to main content

Security report for kvik.com

Kvik · Retail · Denmark

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kvik is a retail company specializing in kitchen products and services, targeting consumers interested in kitchen design and renovation primarily in Denmark and other European countries. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Next.js, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Cookiebot, Sleeknote, Tealium, and Abtasty. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, but a dedicated privacy policy page was not found in the provided content. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification, but the website's professional presentation and use of reputable third-party services suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, security, and business credibility, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and contact information availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kvik.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kvik operates in the retail sector focusing on kitchen solutions, with a strong market presence in multiple European countries as indicated by multiple country-specific domains. The business model centers on direct retail and customer service for kitchen products. The company leverages advanced digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and advertising effectiveness. The absence of explicit company registration or contact details on the website suggests a potential area for transparency improvement. The use of multiple third-party platforms indicates a mature partnership ecosystem supporting marketing and analytics. Growth indicators include extensive use of multivariate testing and personalized marketing tools. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy policy visibility and incident response readiness to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing is balanced with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure information represents a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears focused on user privacy and data protection through consent management but could benefit from enhanced transparency and documented security frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page accessible from the homepage.
  2. Provide explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Add visible and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kvik
Description
Kvik is a company specializing in kitchen solutions, offering kitchen products and services primarily targeting consumers interested in kitchen design and renovation.
Key services
Kitchen design, Kitchen products, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Sleeknote, Tealium, Spotify embeds, Front app, Abtasty
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Tealium, Front
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook, Google AdSense, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Snapchat
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Pinterest Tag, Snapchat Pixel
Marketing tools
Sleeknote, Tealium, Abtasty
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy management implemented
  3. No direct contact information or privacy policy page found in provided HTML
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification
  5. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No security or incident response policies publicly visible
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to kitchen retail sector
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Tealium), marketing (Sleeknote, Abtasty), and social media tracking (Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest). Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, inferred from cookie providers and domain references. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses advanced cookie consent management via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on numerous third-party scripts may introduce privacy and performance considerations. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and reduce technical debt by consolidating tracking scripts and enhancing security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kvik.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kvik.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.